02
Product strategy is born in industrial design
Intent alone is not enough
Product strategy is often treated as something that comes before design: a set of intentions agreed on upstream and later executed into a product. That feels intuitive, because it suggests strategy can be resolved on slides and spreadsheets, in abstraction, before the complexity of making something real intervenes. In physical product development, however, this assumption rarely holds. Strategy does not become real when it is declared; it becomes real once the industrial design process begins.
Strategic intent is cheap, and alignment around it feels comfortable. It can be refined, adjusted, or replaced without immediate consequence. Statements about simplicity, premium quality, or differentiation express aspiration, not strategy. They become strategic only when they impose trade-offs that cannot be undone—when decisions are made about feature sets, product architecture, materials, manufacturing, and supply chain. That is the moment strategy is actually born. Industrial design is where these trade-offs move from abstract intent into reality.
You can’t decide later when you build physical products
This distinction matters because physical products do not allow decisions to remain open indefinitely. In digital systems, it is often possible to postpone choices with the assumption that they can be corrected later. In physical systems, that assumption breaks down quickly. Once tooling is commissioned, suppliers engaged, certifications pursued, and production pathways defined, decisions start to carry weight. They persist in products that remain in the market for years, shaping user behavior, internal processes, and future development work.
What makes this difficult to manage is that decisions rarely become irreversible all at once. They harden gradually, through progress. Design advances, engineering converges, procurement begins aligning options, and each step appears reasonable in isolation. Because there is no single moment where someone says “this is now fixed,” teams often believe flexibility remains, even as it is disappearing. When the consequences finally surface, the cost of changing course is already too high. At that point, the issue is often described as a UX problem or an execution failure. In reality, it is a strategy problem that was never made explicit early enough to be controlled.
The product shows what you really decided
Industrial design is the point where strategy stops being theoretical. If you want to understand a company’s real strategy, it is more useful to look at its products than at its plans. A product quietly reveals what the team assumed about its users, what behavior it expects, and what it tolerates. It also reveals where compromises were accepted, even if no one remembers agreeing to them.
For this reason, industrial design in complex products cannot be treated as a downstream service that simply executes prior decisions. It functions as a form of governance. It is where decision ownership becomes visible, and where trade-offs are resolved in ways that cannot be quietly reversed later.
The moment when strategy becomes real
In physical products, strategy is tested at commitment points. It is not proven by how clearly it is articulated, but by whether it holds together once decisions become expensive and options narrow. Industrial design is where this test happens, because it is where intent is translated into constraints the organization must live with.
The implication for leadership is uncomfortable but clear. Better strategic outcomes do not come from more articulation or alignment. They come from earlier embodiment. Products will encode decisions regardless of whether those decisions are shaped deliberately. The only choice is whether they are made visible and owned while they are still controllable, or whether they harden silently while everyone is still discussing intent.
In that sense, industrial design is not primarily about form or aesthetics. It is the discipline of making decisions visible, so they can be made explicitly—before they become irreversible. That is why product strategy does not come into existence through intent alone. In physical systems, it comes into existence through industrial design.
If this feels familiar, this is the kind of situation we help teams gain clarity on.